The jury, in Delaware, agreed with Apple that previous iterations of Masimo’s W1 and Freedom watches and chargers willfully violated Apple’s patent rights in smartwatch designs. But the jury awarded the tech giant, which is worth about $3.5 trillion, just $250 in damages—the statutory minimum for infringement in the United States.

A jury in Delaware awarded Apple $250, concluding that Masimo's older smartwatch designs infringed on Apple's design patents. The jury determined the infringement was intentional, but the verdict's impact is limited to discontinued products,

A jury in Delaware awarded Apple $250 in a lawsuit against Masimo Corp., finding that some of the company's older smartwatches infringed on Apple Watch design patents. The verdict is the latest chapter in a heated dispute between the two companies over smartwatch tech.

The jury, in Delaware, agreed with Apple that previous iterations of Masimo's W1 and Freedom watches and chargers willfully violated Apple's patent rights in smartwatch designs. But the jury awarded the tech giant, which is worth about $3.5 trillion, just $250 in damages - the statutory minimum for infringement in the United States.

The jury agreed with Apple that Masimo’s W1 and Freedom watches and chargers willfully violated Apple’s patent rights.

A federal jury Friday ruled that Masimo's smartwatches infringed on Apple Watch patents, but awarded Apple just $250 in damages, which is

But what was even more amusing is than neither Apple not Masimo could admit what the case was really about for the respective parties … Apple argued that health tech company Masimo had infringed on its design patents by copying the look of the Apple Watch and charger.

A federal jury awarded Apple a nominal $250 in damages in its ongoing legal battle with Masimo, the medical technology company. Apple’s lawsuit centered on claims that Masimo’s earlier smartwatch models,